Comment Board

Latest comment posted 53 months ago

FY 14 Budget Process

The City of Alexandria anticipates Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 to be another challenging year as it continues to strategically plan for its future. As the City begins the budget process, we would like your input regarding the FY 2014 Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program.

The City of Alexandria encourages public comments on the issues presented on our sites. Please be sure that your comments relate to the topic of the board on which they're posted. Please do not post any comments that attack or threaten another person, misrepresent the source, are obscene or use profanity, give out someone's personal information, promote unlawful discrimination, contain irrelevant references to commercial businesses, are illegal, or duplicate your previous comments on the same board.

The City reserves the right, but assumes no obligation, to remove comments that violate this policy. If you would like to request a City service, please use our Call.Click.Connect. system instead. Information submitted on our sites may be retained or disclosed in accordance with law.
Add a comment
Additional comments may not be posted to this board.
Page: 1 of 3


During the most recent election all candidates spoke eloquently about the need for affordable housing. What has changed? Restore the dedicated funding and stop playing games.

chuck benagh (364) | User | June 10, 2013 - 12:33 PM

Yet another update: I'm glad to hear talk that the Alexandria library system's materials budget might not be reduced by a full $56K, but even a partial cut is unacceptable, given that the system's budget is in the millions. Perhaps one compromise would be to restore the full $56K with the understanding it would be spent mainly on books of the most useful kind from a literacy perspective--for example, those good for reading aloud to young children. Or how about popular-level sports biographies and other books that can help turn many teenagers into more eager readers? Related promotion of these titles could happen away from, not just within, library branches. For example, nurses at health clinics could recommend the read-aloud library books to young mothers, and coaches could nudge student athletes to read the sports books, some of which the coaches themselves might help the librarians choose. Talk about maximum bang per buck of tax money!

Remember, our per-capita spending on library books is already below the national average. A cut of any size will reflect badly on Alexandria and its priorities. With a proposed City budget in the hundreds of millions, why should our City Council do even a $56K Scrooge act on the library materials budget? Come the next election, this just might surface as an issue just as BRAC-133 did.

Please, Council members. Do the right thing, especially for Alexandria's young people.

David Rothman
(Alexandria citizen since 1993)

David H. Rothman - (355) | User | May 6, 2013 - 2:01 PM

Further update: Amazon’s book city #1 avoids cuts in library hours but still might reduce its library book budget--already below U.S. average (

David Rothman (362) | User | May 3, 2013 - 2:55 PM

Update: "Cut in Alexandria, VA, library hours not needed, says city staff memo. Also: Councilman Justin Wilson endorses LibraryCity’s national digital library endowment idea" ( Now if only the library board and the council can DEFINITELY avoid the hours cuts! What's more, it still looks as if the city will trim $56K from the books budget--already well under national and state averages per capita. Speak up as soon as possible since the work session affecting the library budget is tonight (yes, Monday night)!

David H. Rothman - (355) | User | April 29, 2013 - 12:29 AM

Even in cold-blooded business terms, the proposed library cuts in Alexandria don’t make sense--neither the trimmed hours nor the stinginess toward paper books, e-books and other items.

What’s the better scenario for the taxpayers in the end? Alexandrians on welfare (or drawing the minimum wage)? Or motivated citizens given a decent chance to upgrade their reading and other skills during hours convenient to working people?

In a city with a proposed $626-million budget and an abundance of $1-million-plus houses containing 50-inch flat-screen televisions and pricey Colonial-era antiques, the slashing of some $150,000 from the people and books budgets would hardly be a wise route to fiscal sanity. I’ll offer a better solution, a library-linked real estate surtax limited to the citizens who can truly afford it.

Doubt the need? The Alexandria Library’s per capita budget for books and other content was just $3.25 for the 2012 fiscal year, less than the cost of a Big Mac hamburger. My sympathy goes out to the library’s director, Rose Dawson (yes, same as the Titanic heroine), who I’m confident is trying to do her best with the resources available. The $3.25 is less than the $4.22-per-capita spending for America’s libraries as a whole in FY 2010, per statistics from the Institute of Museum and Library Services, as well as the $3.77 Virginia average. Alas, the misguided economizing makes a mockery of Amazon’s ranking of Alexandria as America’s “most well-read” city of more than 100,000. This in a place where most of the high school students qualify for school lunches and, as I’ve noted on the site, aren’t exactly raised by Dickens-and-Austen-loving parents! While I favor the creation of a national digital library endowment (, it would be no replacement for robust local support of public libraries here or elsewhere.

Want proof that Alexandria is embarrassingly behind? See Table 23 at the Web address of

Instead of shortchanging K-12 students and other library users of books, our city could reap plaudits in the national media, by dramatically boosting the materials budget so we surpassed rather than lagged the state and national averages. We’re a well-to-do Washington suburb--at least in terms of mean income, skewed upward by our multimillionaire residents--rather than rural Mississippi. Let’s give the budget story a newsworthy twist, a happy ending, so the Amazon ballyhoo is a little closer to reality.

I’ve just emailed a Washington Post editor about our city’s current miserliness toward the Alexandria Library, in regard to both the proposed hours of operation and the purchase of new books, and I have also written about it myself on the site at May the city administration respond in a helpful way! I know that City Manager Rashad Young’s heart is in the right place; I’m aware of his membership on the executive board of the Urban Libraries Council ( The council exists to strengthen and promote “the value of libraries as essential public assets.” I am certain that Mr. Young is dismayed by the tough choices, so, to reduce the unpleasantness, here are some friendly suggestions for him and other city officials, especially council members who will vote on the budget.

Short-term, please find other ways to save money; and if need be increase the city’s debt, since the amount would be tiny in the grand scheme of things. Long term, as a partial source of funds for our library, Alexandria should at least slightly raise the real estate taxes on houses in the very upper range. We need a special library surtax in those instances, given the importance of libraries to young people, seniors and other Alexandrians. If any of the wealthy object, we’ll all know what this is about: the hyper-privileged versus those reliant on the Alexandria Library as a life-improver. Fight this out in the Virginia legislature, with national publicity, if statutory obstacles exist (I don’t know--although the word “surtax,” anyway, didn’t produce a hit when I searched the Virginia Code via the database at Encourage other localities throughout the country to create similar surtaxes.

Actually, the “versus” isn’t quite the word to use in many cases when discussing the wealthy and the rest of us in the United States. Guess who, along with the workers themselves, benefits from the upgraded skills? Why, the American business owner, of course--both large and small. That includes shareholders. Recent technological developments, such as 3D printing, as well as worries about increased transportation costs, could bring home a lot of business from China, at least if we’re prepared. Well-financed public libraries can result in smarter workers able to earn more and pay more taxes.

I’m certain that the most enlightened of our wealthy citizens would gladly shell out a little extra, remembering that Andrew Carnegie, not a social worker, not a teacher, not a librarian, but an industrialist, is regarded by many as the patron saint of the library world. At the same time Carnegie, while spending millions on several thousand library buildings in the U.S., his native Scotland and nations as remote as Mauritus and Fiji, expected cities to stock the stacks adequately and pay other operating expenditures. Let Alexandria not be Scrooge.


Posted to Also see

David H. Rothman - (355) | User | April 28, 2013 - 9:51 PM

Has a request been made for proposals from private pool operating companies? How much would be saved by contracting out the operations of all our pools?

I've been to Warwick several times. One cost-cutting suggestion is to not have a lifeguard in the baby pool. And there's usually 2-3 guards on deck, 1 at the desk, and 1 or 2 in the chairs. Seems like a lot of labor.

$2 for unlimited pool use is nothing. At least double it. The soft playroom at Chinquapin is $4 for 30 minutes and demand is never slack.

million (351) | User | April 9, 2013 - 12:41 PM

Please do not cut Duncan's evening hours! I have tutored there as an adult literacy teacher for almost three years. Duncan is always busy. The library is a really important part of the neighborhood. The Council cutting the library's hours sends the message that they don't know or don't care (or both) about how important the library is to Del Ray. I work during the week and can only use the library's services on their late nights or on Saturdays, and I go at least twice a week. I would never vote for someone who would approve cutting the library services. It's one of the few things I'm happy to pay taxes for.

Alana H. (349) | User | April 4, 2013 - 1:19 PM

Please retain all the evening hours in the libraries, in particular, Duncan. The current proposal would reduce by half the evening availability of the library to working families, students and many others. In addition, Duncan's only meeting room would be available 2 hours a week. Thus, library activities such as book groups, poetry clubs, and movie nights would have to compete with outside groups for time and space, thereby depriving the public of valued activities. Thank you.

Linda Clover (348) | User | March 30, 2013 - 8:16 AM

How can you give $650,000 to a profit making enterprise to come into Alexandria to accommodate a select group of bicycle riders (mostly visitors) and cut library hours. You have your priorities, not to mention the interests of Alexandria citizens totally skewed. Keep the $650,000 and use it to the keep the libraries' hours as they are.

Walter Gross (345) | User | March 29, 2013 - 11:49 AM

Our libraries are heavily used by citizens of all ages who have cut back on all discretionary expenses. Save evening access, especially for Duncan Branch.

hmcguire (347) | User | March 28, 2013 - 8:54 PM

Page: 1 of 3