Main content
City of Alexandria Homepage
Thursday, March 5  •  National Weather Service Advisory 45°Light Rain Air Quality: Yellow
CloseWeather Forecast
Today: High 33° Low 8°
SnowAir Quality: Yellow
Fri: High 29° Low 11°
SunnyAir Quality: Yellow
Sat: High 44° Low 25°
Mostly SunnyAir Quality: Yellow
Sun: High 47° Low 28°
Mostly SunnyAir Quality: Yellow
Alert

The National Weather Service has issued a Winter Storm Warning for the Alexandria area for Thursday, March 5, from midnight to 9 p.m. A snow emergency has been declared for the City of Alexandria, with enforcement of snow emergency routes to begin at 7 a.m. on Thursday, March 5. Significant accumulation of ice and snow may result in a Level 2 storm, which means that travel could be dangerous and some residential roads may not be clear until later in the week. Because the storm is expected to begin with rain, pre-treating streets with salt brine will not be effective. This type of precipitation often results in power outages. The City urges all residents and businesses to be prepared on an ongoing basis for the possibility that it may not be safe to travel for three or more days, and that power may be out during this period.

City of Alexandria, VA City of Alexandria, VA
  • By Date
  • By Board

Connie Graham (user 367) - Comments by Date

Concur that the plan seems to be more about the process of engagement and measurement of engagement. This is analogous to the series of wine and cheese meetings that the developers had about Potomac Yard, and then the developers did what they wanted to anyway. Did they engage with the public? Yes, in every sense of the word, but the outcome was as if they had never met with the public. The International Association for Public Participation (IAPE) Spectrum of Public Participation is at http://www.dpcd.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/43183/Engagement_Guide.pdf, It show five levels of engagement: Inform, Consult, Involve, Collaborate, and Empower.
Under "Inform", the promise to the public is "we will keep you informed." For "Consult," the promise to the public is "We will keep you informed, listen to and
acknowledge concerns and aspirations, and provide feedback on how public input influenced
the decision." For "Involve" the promise to the public is "We will work with you to ensure that your concerns and aspirations are directly reflected in the
alternatives developed and provide feedback on how public input
influenced the decision." For "collaborate," the promise to the public is "We will look to you for advice and innovation in
formulating solutions and incorporate your advice and recommendations into the decisions to the maximum extent possible." The most responsive option on the spectrum of engagement is "empower" and the promise to the public is "We will implement what you decide." My best sense of past and current engagement practices in Alexandria is that they operate at "Inform," while they say they will "consult." There is no guarantee that apparent public opinion (as evidenced by many speakers and filling the City Hall Chambers)is a reflection of the wishes and needs of constituents. I remember one packed City Hall meeting about the location of the Carpenter's Shelter where the majority of supporters were non-resident "ringer" do-gooders that used a •Argumentum ad Consequentiam " logic about supporting the shelter's exsistence, when the real issue was the location of the shelter, which was opposed by the residents due to concerns about drugs and the location near a park.

Connie Graham (367) | User | July 30, 2013 - 4:09 PM | Civic Engagement Handbook Comment Board

Connie Graham (user 367) - Comments by Board

Civic Engagement Handbook Comment Board

Concur that the plan seems to be more about the process of engagement and measurement of engagement. This is analogous to the series of wine and cheese meetings that the developers had about Potomac Yard, and then the developers did what they wanted to anyway. Did they engage with the public? Yes, in every sense of the word, but the outcome was as if they had never met with the public. The International Association for Public Participation (IAPE) Spectrum of Public Participation is at http://www.dpcd.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/43183/Engagement_Guide.pdf, It show five levels of engagement: Inform, Consult, Involve, Collaborate, and Empower.
Under "Inform", the promise to the public is "we will keep you informed." For "Consult," the promise to the public is "We will keep you informed, listen to and
acknowledge concerns and aspirations, and provide feedback on how public input influenced
the decision." For "Involve" the promise to the public is "We will work with you to ensure that your concerns and aspirations are directly reflected in the
alternatives developed and provide feedback on how public input
influenced the decision." For "collaborate," the promise to the public is "We will look to you for advice and innovation in
formulating solutions and incorporate your advice and recommendations into the decisions to the maximum extent possible." The most responsive option on the spectrum of engagement is "empower" and the promise to the public is "We will implement what you decide." My best sense of past and current engagement practices in Alexandria is that they operate at "Inform," while they say they will "consult." There is no guarantee that apparent public opinion (as evidenced by many speakers and filling the City Hall Chambers)is a reflection of the wishes and needs of constituents. I remember one packed City Hall meeting about the location of the Carpenter's Shelter where the majority of supporters were non-resident "ringer" do-gooders that used a •Argumentum ad Consequentiam " logic about supporting the shelter's exsistence, when the real issue was the location of the shelter, which was opposed by the residents due to concerns about drugs and the location near a park.

Connie Graham (367) | User | July 30, 2013 - 4:09 PM